GeForce GT 645M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing GeForce GT 645M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 645M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 603% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
GeForce GT 645M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 19% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 53% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13P-GS | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X