FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GT 650M SLI
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 650M SLI, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 650M SLI is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GT 650M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 650M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 650M SLI have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 650M SLI - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 40 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 650M SLI - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 650M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Dota 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Fortnite is 78% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 93% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in World of Tanks is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 650M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N13E-GE |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 790 MHz |
Boost Clock | 835 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |