GeForce GT 650M SLI vs GeForce GTX 295
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M SLI and GeForce GTX 295 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M SLI will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 295 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 650M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M SLI.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 452 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M SLI.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 3001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 650M SLI and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GE | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 790 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Boost Clock | 835 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Quadro K4100M
- GeForce GT 650M SLI vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro K4100M
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275