GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 650M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 650M SLI stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GT 650M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M SLI.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 216 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 650M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| GeForce GT 650M SLI and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Fortnite is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M SLI in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M SLI | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 790 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 835 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |