FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GT 650M
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 650M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 650M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GT 650M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 1566% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S10000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 650M - with Kepler.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 650M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S10000 and GeForce GT 650M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 176% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 383% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GT 650M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GT 650M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N13E-GE |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 900 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 21 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- GeForce GT 650M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- GeForce GT 650M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6
- FirePro S10000 vs FireStream 9250
- GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 6
- GeForce GT 650M vs FireStream 9250