FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GT 650M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 650M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 650M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GT 650M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 64% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 650M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 650M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GT 650M - with Kepler.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 650M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 650M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 650M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GT 650M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Juniper | N13E-GE |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |