FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GT 650M
In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and GeForce GT 650M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 650M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
GeForce GT 650M
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V7900 has 235% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 650M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V7900 and GeForce GT 650M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M - in Laptops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GeForce GT 650M - with Kepler.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 650M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
3−4
ultra / 1080p
6−7
1−2
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
20−22
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
180−190
120−130
medium / 768p
150−160
95−100
ultra / 1080p
75−80
45−50
QHD / 1440p
45−50
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
110−120
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
95−100
80−85
medium / 768p
80−85
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
4K / 2160p
5−6
2−3
low / 720p
30−33
14−16
medium / 1080p
14−16
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
20−22
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
80−85
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 77% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
18−20
8−9
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
QHD / 1440p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
70−75
50−55
medium / 768p
60−65
40−45
high / 1080p
21−24
8−9
ultra / 1080p
9−10
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
5−6
1−2
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
7−8
medium / 1080p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−105
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
21−24
7−8
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
40−45
16−18
medium / 768p
24−27
12−14
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 137% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
95−100
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
GeForce GT 650M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Code name
Cayman
N13E-GE
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 May 2011
22 March 2012
Pipelines
1280
384
Core clock speed
725 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
652.8 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1800 - 4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 API
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
21 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price