GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GT 650M
When comparing GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GT 650M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GT 650M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GT 650M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 211% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 650M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 510 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GT 650M - with Kepler.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 650M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Dota 2 is 141% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Minecraft is 69% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GT 650M | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Kepler |
| Code name | G92 | N13E-GE |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 March 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 128 | 384 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | Via Adapter | + |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |