GeForce GT 650M vs GeForce GTX 285
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and GeForce GTX 285 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 285 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M
GeForce GTX 285
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
204 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3\GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 353% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
GeForce GT 650M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 285 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GT 650M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 285 - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 285 - with Tesla 2.0.
GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M is 558 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
7−8
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
5−6
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 650M and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
140−150
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
45−50
55−60
QHD / 1440p
24−27
30−35
4K / 2160p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
GeForce GT 650M and GeForce GTX 285 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
80−85
80−85
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
4−5
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
20−22
medium / 1080p
5−6
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
10−12
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−12
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Fortnite is 27% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
medium / 768p
40−45
45−50
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
2−3
5−6
ultra / 1080p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
85−90
90−95
ultra / 1080p
80−85
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
16−18
24−27
medium / 768p
12−14
16−18
high / 1080p
6−7
10−11
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M
GeForce GTX 285
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Code name
N13E-GE
GT200B
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
22 March 2012
23 December 2008
Pipelines
384
240
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
652.8 gflops
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
128bit
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 - 4000 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
4.0
OpenGL
4.5
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
384
240
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
3D Blu-Ray
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
21 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
