GeForce GT 650M vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 650M and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 650M stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 650M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 68% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 53% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |