GeForce GT 650M vs GRID K260Q
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 133% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 170% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |