GeForce GT 650M vs GRID K520
When choosing between GeForce GT 650M and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 650M and GRID K520.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GT 650M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N13E-GE | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |