GeForce GT 650M vs GRID M10 8Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 650M and GRID M10 8Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 650M and GRID M10 8Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M10 8Q
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M10 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and GRID M10 8Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M10 8Q - with Maxwell.
- GeForce GT 650M and GRID M10 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 3400 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 48% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 116% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 76% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | GRID M10 8Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |