GeForce GT 650M vs Quadro K5000
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and Quadro K5000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M
Quadro K5000
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
122 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3\GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5000 has 171% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
GeForce GT 650M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K5000 - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 650M and Quadro K5000 are build with Kepler architecture.
GeForce GT 650M and Quadro K5000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000 is 3600 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
20−22
ultra / 1080p
1−2
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 650M and Quadro K5000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
95−100
200−210
ultra / 1080p
45−50
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
85−90
4K / 2160p
18−20
45−50
high / 768p
70−75
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
14−16
50−55
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
10−12
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
120−130
medium / 1080p
14−16
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−11
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
50−55
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
90−95
high / 1080p
8−9
40−45
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 146% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 242% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
16−18
70−75
medium / 768p
12−14
45−50
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M
Quadro K5000
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
N13E-GE
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
22 March 2012
17 August 2012
Pipelines
384
1536
Core clock speed
706 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
90.37
Floating-point performance
652.8 gflops
2,169 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
128bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 - 4000 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
21 Mh/s
111 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.2 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
