GeForce GT 650M vs Quadro M2000
When comparing GeForce GT 650M and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 650M and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3\GDDR5
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M2000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
GeForce GT 650M and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4812 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
1−2
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
18−20
65−70
medium / 1080p
7−8
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 650M and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
95−100
200−210
ultra / 1080p
45−50
120−130
QHD / 1440p
24−27
90−95
4K / 2160p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
70−75
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
80−85
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
14−16
50−55
medium / 1080p
5−6
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
10−12
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
120−130
medium / 1080p
14−16
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
3−4
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−11
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
50−55
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
95−100
high / 1080p
8−9
40−45
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 271% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
16−18
75−80
medium / 768p
12−14
45−50
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 325% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GT 650M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
N13E-GE
GM206
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
22 March 2012
8 April 2016
Pipelines
384
768
Core clock speed
796 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1163 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.82
Floating-point performance
652.8 gflops
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 - 4000 MHz
6612 MHz
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
21 Mh/s
215 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price