GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon Pro 570
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and Radeon Pro 570 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 570 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 570
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 570 has 166% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro 570 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 4980 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 650M and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 176% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 383% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GT 650M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | N13E-GE | Polaris 20 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 123.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |