GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon R9 370
When comparing GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 370
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 650M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 144% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 3800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 650M and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 176% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 383% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GT 650M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 650M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N13E-GE | Trinidad |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |