GeForce GT 650M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce GT 650M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 650M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 428% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1188 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |