GeForce GT 730M vs P104 100
When choosing between GeForce GT 730M and P104 100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 730M and P104 100.
P104 100
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 730M | P104 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 730M and P104 100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GT 730M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 730M is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 882 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8208 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 1320% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 730M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 222% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 730M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2133% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 6−7 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 5−6 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2150% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than GeForce GT 730M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 730M | P104 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK107 | GP104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 January 2013 | 12 December 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 | 208.0 |
Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |