GeForce GT 730M vs Quadro FX 4800
In this comparison between GeForce GT 730M and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 730M will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 730M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 730M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 123 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 730M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GT 730M and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 730M | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.20 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |