GeForce GT 730M vs Tesla C2050
When comparing GeForce GT 730M and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 730M and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 730M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 621% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 730M has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GT 730M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 730M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 730M is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GT 730M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 700% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 633% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1133% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1000% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GeForce GT 730M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 730M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK107 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 January 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |