GeForce 920A vs GeForce GT 735M
When comparing GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 920A
GeForce GT 735M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 735M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 735M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce GT 735M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 33 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 735M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 735M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 379 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 735M.
- GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 202 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 735M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 920A and GeForce GT 735M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | GeForce GT 735M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208B | N14M-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 889 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 18.40 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 39 Mh/s | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |