Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    GeForce GT 735M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

    In this comparison between GeForce GT 735M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 735M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    GeForce GT 735M Check Price
    GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q Check Price

    GeForce GT 735M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: GeForce GT 735M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 735M or GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:

    GeForce GT 735M Laptops
    GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      GeForce GT 735M GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 30 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5, GDDR6
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • GeForce GT 735M has 10% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
    • GeForce GT 735M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 735M.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • GeForce GT 735M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 445 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 735M.
    • GeForce GT 735M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 6200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 735M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 35−40
    ultra / 1080p − 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 1−2 60−65
    medium / 1080p 0−1 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GT 735M.

    Full Specs

      GeForce GT 735M GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
    Architecture Kepler Turing
    Code name N14M-LP N18P-G0 / N18P-G61
    Type Laptop Laptop
    Release date 1 April 2013 23 April 2019
    Pipelines 384 1024
    Core clock speed 575 MHz 1020 MHz
    Boost Clock 889 MHz 1245 MHz
    Transistor count 915 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 18.40 72.00
    Floating-point performance 441.6 gflops
    Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 - 2000 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB/s 112.1 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 API 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.5 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2.140
    CUDA + 7.5
    Bus support PCI Express 3.0
    HDMI +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 39 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Standard memory configuration DDR3
    eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
    LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
    DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
    HDCP content protection +
    7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI +
    TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming +
    H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder +
    Optimus +
    Blu-Ray 3D Support +
    3D Vision / 3DTV Play +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares