FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GT 740A
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GT 740A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 740A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 740A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GT 740A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 33 Watt.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GT 740A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GT 740A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GT 740A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GT 740A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 740A is 380 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce GT 740A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 2700 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 740A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GT 740A. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GT 740A | |
Architecture | GCN | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GK208 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 26 August 2013 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 31.36 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |