GeForce GT 740A vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 740A and GeForce GTX 260M SLI, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 740A stacks up against GeForce GTX 260M SLI, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 740A
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 740A | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 740A.
- GeForce GT 740A and GeForce GTX 260M SLI have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GT 740A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 740A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 740A is 430 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GT 740A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 260M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 740A is 850 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 303% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in Minecraft is 83% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260M SLI in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GT 740A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 740A | GeForce GTX 260M SLI | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | G9x |
Code name | GK208 | NB9E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 | 224 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 550 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |