GeForce GT 740A vs GeForce MX150
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 740A and GeForce MX150. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 740A and GeForce MX150. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GT 740A
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 740A | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 740A has 230% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce GT 740A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 740A.
- GeForce GT 740A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 740A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 488 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 740A.
- GeForce GT 740A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4208 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 740A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 740A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce GT 740A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 740A | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GK208 | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 6550A
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce GT 740A vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000