GeForce GT 740A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 740A and Iris Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 740A stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 740A
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 740A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 740A is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 740A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GeForce GT 740A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 740A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GT 740A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce GT 740A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 740A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GK208 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 August 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.5 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 6550A
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 6550A
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce GT 740A vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- GeForce GT 740A vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000