GeForce GT 745A vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Plus Graphics 640, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GeForce GT 745A
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 745A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GeForce GT 745A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 537 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 62% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M280X
- GeForce GT 745A vs GeForce 940A
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 M280X
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce 940A
- GeForce GT 745A vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GeForce GT 745A vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M