GeForce GT 745A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GT 745A
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 637 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 745A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | GK107 | Haswell GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 August 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 392 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 52.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M280X
- GeForce GT 745A vs GeForce 940A
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M280X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce 940A
- GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce GT 745A vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book