GeForce GT 745A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GT 745A
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 745A has 120% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GT 745A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 537 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
GeForce GT 745A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
GeForce GT 745A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 745A in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GK107 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M280X
- GeForce GT 745A vs GeForce 940A
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M280X
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce 940A
- GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GT 745A vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2