GeForce GT 745A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
In this comparison between GeForce GT 745A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 745A will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 745A
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 437 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 247% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 360% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 176% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 52% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 257% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 375% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GK107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M280X
- GeForce GT 745A vs GeForce 940A
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M280X
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 940A
- GeForce GT 745A vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395