GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon Pro 560X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Radeon Pro 560X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 745A stacks up against Radeon Pro 560X, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 745A
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 560X has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 70 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 3280 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 745A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 322% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 98% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 194% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 140% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 40% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 214% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK107 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |