GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M390X
When comparing GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M390X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M390X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GT 745A
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390X has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M390X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 114 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M390X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 159% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 247% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 360% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 176% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 52% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 257% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 375% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3 |
Code name | GK107 | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |