FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GT 750M SLI
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M SLI, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M SLI is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 750M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M SLI have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 750M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 750M SLI - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 217 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 750M SLI - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1600 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 130% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 137% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Fortnite is 107% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 150% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 750M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14P-GT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 April 2013 |
Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 967 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1300 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |