GeForce GT 750M SLI vs GeForce GTX 280
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 280, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 750M SLI stacks up against GeForce GTX 280, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 750M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 280 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 329 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GT200 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1296 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1107 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |