GeForce GT 750M SLI vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When comparing GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 750M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 333 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 750M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Fortnite is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14P-GT | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 768 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |