GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 242 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Fortnite is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M SLI | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Radeon Pro 555
- GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Quadro K5000M
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon Pro 555
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Quadro K5000M
- GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370