GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M SLI and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 66 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GT 750M SLI and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4x 1,672 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 5.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |