FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GT 750M
When comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 750M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 750M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GT 750M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 217 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1600 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GT 750M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GT 750M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N14P-GT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 April 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 30.94 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2000 - 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64.19 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |