GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 850A
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 850A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 850A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 750M has 11% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 65 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 850A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 750M and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N14P-GT | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 902 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 936 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 37.44 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 1,198 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |