GeForce GT 750M vs GRID M60 1Q
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and GRID M60 1Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 1Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | GRID M60 1Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 750M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 410 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- GeForce GT 750M and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 214% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 238% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−105 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 117% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 87% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 222% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 215% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 8−9 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 184% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 270% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GT 750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | GRID M60 1Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |