GeForce GT 750M vs P106 100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 750M and P106 100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 750M stacks up against P106 100, check out specs charts below.
P106 100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 140% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P106 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 539 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 6008 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 414% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 313% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GT 750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N14P-GT | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |