GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When choosing between GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 50 Watt.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 237 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 26% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 780 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 18.72 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |