GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 750M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 242 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 A265 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce GTX 560M
- GeForce GT 750M vs GeForce 930MX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 560M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce 930MX
- GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics