GeForce GT 750M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 67 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GeForce GT 750M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Fortnite is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N14P-GT | Topaz |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |