GeForce GT 750M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 750M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 750M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 393 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 988 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 142% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 124% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |