GeForce GT 750M vs Tesla M6
When comparing GeForce GT 750M and Tesla M6, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 750M and Tesla M6 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 100% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M.
- GeForce GT 750M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M is 37 MHz higher, than Tesla M6.
- GeForce GT 750M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 3012 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 457% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 476% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 163% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 344% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 438% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 273% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 470% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 570% more, than GeForce GT 750M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce GT 750M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 750M | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N14P-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 April 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.94 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |