FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GT 755M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 755M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GT 755M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GT 755M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 2x ~50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 10900% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 755M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 755M SLI - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M SLI is 156 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce GT 755M SLI are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M SLI is 400 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 162% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GT 755M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce GT 755M SLI have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 112% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GT 755M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Hawaii | N14P-? |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 November 2013 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2x 1300 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 2x 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX 550X mobile
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4100
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon RX 550X mobile