GeForce GT 755M SLI vs GeForce GTX 295
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M SLI and GeForce GTX 295 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M SLI will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 295 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 755M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 2x ~50 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 14350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
- GeForce GT 755M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 262 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
- GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M SLI is 4401 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Dota 2 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M SLI in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14P-? | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 November 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 2x 1300 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4100
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon RX 550X mobile
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon RX 550X mobile
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275