GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon R9 270X
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 755M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP)
2x ~50 Watt
180 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2x 2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 270X has 8900% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 270X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GT 755M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 270X - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 755M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 73% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
21−24
40−45
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−12
low / 720p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Battlefield 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
240−250
medium / 768p
170−180
210−220
ultra / 1080p
90−95
140−150
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
24−27
60−65
high / 768p
140−150
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GT 755M SLI and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
60−65
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
24−27
40−45
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
QHD / 1440p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
95−100
140−150
medium / 1080p
50−55
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Fortnite is 58% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
24−27
40−45
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
QHD / 1440p
7−8
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
50−55
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Metro Exodus is 78% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
30−35
55−60
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GT 755M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M SLI
Radeon R9 270X
Architecture
Kepler
GCN
Code name
N14P-?
Curacao XT
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
1 November 2013
8 October 2013
Pipelines
768
1280
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
2x 1300 Million
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
84.00
Floating-point performance
2,688 gflops
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
+
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
318 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
TrueAudio
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
163 Sol/s
AppAcceleration
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
Check Price
Check Price